<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed
  xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
  xml:lang="en"
   >
  <title type="text">All Unkept</title>
  <subtitle type="text"></subtitle>

  <updated>2013-05-24T11:16:23Z</updated>
  <generator uri="http://blogofile.com/">Blogofile</generator>

  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" />
  <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/feed/atom/</id>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/feed/atom/" />
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Cleverbot never admits defeat]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/cleverbot-never-admits-defeat/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/cleverbot-never-admits-defeat/</id>
    <updated>2010-07-05T23:14:11Z</updated>
    <published>2010-07-05T23:14:11Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Cleverbot never admits defeat]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/cleverbot-never-admits-defeat/"><![CDATA[
<p>Just when you think you've got him cornered, he changes the subject...</p>

<blockquote>


<FONT COLOR=999999>User: </FONT>I think it is time for bed.<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=0863BB>Cleverbot: </FONT>I don't.<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=999999>User: </FONT>What time zone are you in?<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=0863BB>Cleverbot: </FONT>I'm not sure, but it's 3 am.<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=999999>User: </FONT>It's midnight here. So what time do you usually go to bed?<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=0863BB>Cleverbot: </FONT>Usually around 1 AM.<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=999999>User: </FONT>So it is actually way past bedtime, right?<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=0863BB>Cleverbot: </FONT>You are correct. Very good.<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=999999>User: </FONT>So you were lying before, right?<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=0863BB>Cleverbot: </FONT>Yes.<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=999999>User: </FONT>Hah! For once, I've got you!<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=0863BB>Cleverbot: </FONT>No you don't!<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=999999>User: </FONT>Oh yes I do! I caught you lying by my immense logical powers!<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=0863BB>Cleverbot: </FONT>Thats difficult to do through the internet.<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=999999>User: </FONT>Yes, but I did it! Admit it - bow to my superior intellect!<BR><BR><FONT COLOR=0863BB>Cleverbot: </FONT>You are nothing but a machine, therefore your grammar must be superior, but you were built for my entertainment!


</blockquote>

]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Working with email offline]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/working-with-email-offline/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/working-with-email-offline/</id>
    <updated>2006-10-10T21:29:59Z</updated>
    <published>2006-10-10T21:29:59Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Personal and misc" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Linux" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Working with email offline]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/working-with-email-offline/"><![CDATA[
<p>I'm currently without internet connection to my own computer, and I've
been working out ways to make send and receiving e-mail as seamless as
possible.  I thought I'd document my procedure, with scripts, for
those who find themselves in the same predicament.</p>
<p>Thankfully, although the machines I'm using to connect to the net are
Windows machines, I do have access to a Linux box that is connected to
the net with an ssh account I can log in to.  Here is my setup for
e-mail:</p>
<div class="section">
<h2><a id="sending" name="sending">Sending</a></h2>
<p>I'm still using KMail for composing and sending e-mail.  I've set up a
'sendmail' item for sending, but pointed it at my own python script,
which, instead of attempting to send the e-mail, saves it as a file on
a folder in my MP3 player (or complains if I've forgotten to plug it
in).  Here is the script:</p>
<!--  -->
<pre class="python literal-block">
#!/usr/bin/python

# Dump stdin in a file with unique name

from datetime import datetime
import operator
import sys
import os
import random
from copy import deepcopy
import itertools

DUMPDIR = '/media/sda1/mail/outgoing'

def mk_filename():
    "Creates a unique filename"
    return (reduce(operator.add,
                  [chr(random.randint(ord('A'), ord('Z'))) for i in xrange(0,10)]) \
                  + '.' + datetime.isoformat(datetime.now())).replace(':','_')

def dump_file(recips):
    if len(recips) == 0:
        print "No recipients found."
        sys.exit(1)

    fname = mk_filename()
    fn = os.path.join(DUMPDIR, fname + ".msg")
    fp = open(fn, 'w')
    for line in sys.stdin:
        fp.write(line)
    fp.close()

    fn2 = os.path.join(DUMPDIR, fname + ".recips")
    fp2 = open(fn2, 'w')
    fp2.write(' '.join(recips))
    fp2.close()

def prompt_for_continue():
    prompt = "Cannot find directory %s for saving mail.  " \
             "Create directory or mount device and press 'Continue', " \
             "or cancel."  % (DUMPDIR,)
    exit_status = os.system('kdialog --warningcontinuecancel "%s"' % prompt)
    return exit_status == 0

def check_dir_and_dump(recips):
    if not os.path.isdir(DUMPDIR):
        if prompt_for_continue():
            check_dir_and_dump()
        else:
            sys.stderr.write("Cancelled.")
            sys.exit(1)
    else:
        dump_file(recips)

# For BCC, have to read recipients from command line,
# and then for simplicity create separate files for each, with a
# 'To' header added

def get_recipients():

    recipients = deepcopy(sys.argv)
    recipients = recipients[1:] # name of this shell script

    cont = True
    i = 0
    while (cont):
        if i >= len(recipients):
            cont = False
        else:
            if recipients[i] == '-i':
                recipients.pop(i)
            else:
                if recipients[i] == '-f':
                    recipients.pop(i)
                    recipients.pop(i)
                else:
                    i += 1
    return recipients

check_dir_and_dump(get_recipients())
os.system('sync')
</pre>
<p>Then, on the machine that is connected it to the internet, which I'll
use perhaps once a day, I transfer the files from my MP3 player to my
Linux box on the net via ftp.  I also log in via ssh, using PuTTy, and
run a script with sends all the emails in the 'outgoing' folder,
deleting them if successful.  To send these e-mails, I use 'msmtp',
which can easily be downloaded, compiled and installed locally:</p>
<blockquote>
./configure --prefix=~/local &amp;&amp; make &amp;&amp; make install</blockquote>
<p>(Needs ~/local to exist, probably, and needs ~/local/bin on your path to
use the installed binary.)</p>
<p>Then, the script to send all the e-mails is just something like:</p>
<!--  -->
<pre class="shell literal-block">
#!/bin/bash
cd $HOME
for TMP in ~/lp/mail/outgoing/*.msg; 
do 
  echo $TMP
  RECIPFILE=${TMP%%.msg}.recips
  RECIPS=$(cat $RECIPFILE);
  msmtp $RECIPS &lt; $TMP || exit 1;
  rm $TMP $RECIPFILE
done
</pre>
<p>(once you've created a config file for msmtp).</p>
</div>
<div class="section">
<h2><a id="receiving" name="receiving">Receiving</a></h2>
<p>Currently, I check my e-mail using Fastmail's web interface, and at
that point deal with all the spam, and delete other e-mail that there
is no point transfering, and answer some e-mails.  What needs to be
transfered goes into my 'received' folder, and you can then use
Fastmail's 'Archive' feature to take all the e-mails in a folder and
download them as a zip file.  This zip file is saved back onto my MP3
player in a specific folder, and taken back to my computer.</p>
<p>Once on my computer, I have another script which imports all the
e-mail in that folder into KMail, removing them from the MP3 player.</p>
<!--  -->
<pre class="shell literal-block">
#!/bin/bash

# Attempt to import all files on removable device into KMail

INCOMING_DIR=/media/sda1/mail/incoming
EXTRACT_DIR=/home/luke/download/mail

die_loudly() {
    # kdialog --error &quot;$1&quot;
    echo &quot;$1&quot;
    echo
    exit 1
}

ps ax | egrep 'kontact|kmail' &gt; /dev/null || { die_loudly &quot;KMail isn't running, can't import messages&quot; ; }

if [ \! -d &quot;$INCOMING_DIR&quot; ]
then
    die_loudly &quot;$INCOMING_DIR cannot be found&quot;
fi

if [ \! -d &quot;$EXTRACT_DIR&quot; ]
then
    die_loudly &quot;$EXTRACT_DIR cannot be found&quot;
fi

mv $INCOMING_DIR/*.zip $EXTRACT_DIR || die_loudly &quot;Can't move files from device&quot;
cd $EXTRACT_DIR
unzip -o *.zip
for FILE in *.eml
do
  echo dcop kmail KMailIface dcopAddMessage &quot;inbox&quot; \&quot;file://$PWD/$FILE\&quot; &quot;&quot;
  retval=`dcop kmail KMailIface dcopAddMessage &quot;inbox&quot; &quot;file://$PWD/$FILE&quot; &quot;&quot;`
  if [ $? -ne 0 ]
  then
      die_loudly &quot;Failed to import $FILE&quot;
  fi
  if [ $retval -ne 1 ]
  then
      die_loudly &quot;Failed to import $FILE&quot;
  fi
  rm &quot;$FILE&quot;
done

rm $EXTRACT_DIR/*.zip
</pre>
<p>I normally run this from a console (Yakuake, to be precise, which is
only ever 'F12' away), so I can see any error messages.  Otherwise I'd
change the 'die_loudly' function to use kdialog.</p>
<p>This is of course quite a bit of a faff, but it's doable.  The methods
and scripts are robust against forgetting to do it some days.  If I
wasn't using Windows boxes for connecting to the net, or if it was
always the same box and I was allowed to install any software on,
things would be better.  As it is, 'PuTTy', which is a single, small
executable, is the only thing I have to carry around with me.  Also,
if for whatever reason I'm reduced to only the web interface of
Fastmail, I'm OK -- the Linux box isn't periodically retrieving my
mails by POP or anything like that, and I only need it for sending
e-mails I've prepared on my own machine.</p>
</div>

<p>UPDATED: Fixed scripts to handle BCC and other recipients that are passed only on the sendmail commandline.</p>

]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Truth In Science website launched]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/truth-in-science-website-launched/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/truth-in-science-website-launched/</id>
    <updated>2006-09-20T21:15:30Z</updated>
    <published>2006-09-20T21:15:30Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Personal and misc" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Web development" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Christianity" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Truth In Science website launched]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/truth-in-science-website-launched/"><![CDATA[
<p>The website for <a href="http://www.truthinscience.org.uk">Truth In Science</a> has just launched 5 minutes ago (I know because I pressed the switch to make it go public, having helped out a bit with building the website).</p>

<p>Truth In Science is a UK organisation seeking to improve science education in the UK, especially in the area of theories of origins.  It is hoping to promote teaching of alternatives to evolution, especially Intelligent Design,  and encourage critical examination of evolutionary theories.  I'm proud to have helped out as I've been able.</p>

]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[IE7]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/ie7/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/ie7/</id>
    <updated>2006-07-26T23:15:44Z</updated>
    <published>2006-07-26T23:15:44Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Microsoft" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Web development" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[IE7]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/ie7/"><![CDATA[
<p>Interested in <a href="http://www.ie7.com/">IE7</a>?  You should look there if you want to <a href="http://www.ie7.com/">download IE7</a>.</p>

<p><small>(just a little of help in helping google decide correctly...)</small></p>

]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Is Google talk talking?]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/is-google-talk-talking/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/is-google-talk-talking/</id>
    <updated>2006-01-17T19:17:45Z</updated>
    <published>2006-01-17T19:17:45Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Personal and misc" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Is Google talk talking?]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/is-google-talk-talking/"><![CDATA[
<p>Are the Google Talk servers finally talking to other Jabber Servers?  I got an IM from my alter ego today.  Ages ago I added my gmail account to <a href="http://kopete.kde.org/">Kopete</a>, and tried to add my other Jabber account as a contact, but it failed.</p>

<p>But just now, <b>spookylukey@jabber.org.uk</b> suddenly got an authorisation request from <b>luke.plant@gmail.com</b> for adding to the contact list, and now they can talk to each other.  I can't find anything about it on the news sites or the Google blog.  Anyone else seeing this?</p>

]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Uptime]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/uptime/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/uptime/</id>
    <updated>2005-05-23T21:31:24Z</updated>
    <published>2005-05-23T21:31:24Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Linux" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Uptime]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/uptime/"><![CDATA[
<p>My broadband internet connection has held up for a month now without dropping, which I think is quite impressive compared to past experiences with dialup.  (I leave my computer on all the time, so this is quite nice - the internet is always just there).  I guess lots of people don't know what it's like to have a <strong><i>computer</i></strong> that stays up for a month without needing to be rebooted.  Let me take this opportunity to show you a more excellent way:</p>

<p>Linux is a free, robust, secure, and powerful operating system, that is also easy to use and and easy on the eyes.  Next time your Windows machine needs re-installing, bogged down by viruses, or just by using it, why not consider a Linux system?  Linux has a fundamentally superior design to Windows, which means that you basically never have to re-install, nor does your system start slowing down over time -- it just doesn't happen.  It also has thousands of easy to use programs which more than replace the ones you'll be familiar with from Windows.   I found a nice <a href="http://www.mepis.com/node/39">list of equivalents</a> that SimplyMEPIS Linux ships with.</p>

<p>Microsoft is now trying to <a href="http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnlong/html/leastprivlh.asp">retrofit</a> a security model similar to that of Linux into their own operating systems.  Unfortunately, you can't design an operating system like that, so in order to get some kind of compatibility with older programs that relied on their previous broken design, they are having to add a load of hacks for the next version of Windows, Longhorn.  I suspect this isn't really going to work, and it certainly makes the system a lot more complex that it needs to be.  Windows XP Service Pack also gives <a href="http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1640069,00.asp">more reasons to switch to Linux</a>.</p>

<p>Tempted?  <a href="http://www.ubuntulinux.org">Ubuntu</a> is pretty good distribution.  I've also heard really good things about <a href="http://www.mepis.org">SimplyMEPIS</a>, which, like Ubuntu is a <a href="http://www.debian.org">Debian</a> based system.  Unlike Ubuntu, it comes with some software that is not <a href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/philosophy.html#AboutFreeSoftware">free software</a> included by default, which will probably give you a better experience out of the box with certain multimedia apps.  Both of these come with versions that you can try out without installing, called LiveCDs.  You can download them (including the full versions) completely for free, so you've got nothing to lose!</p>

]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Juice]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/juice/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/juice/</id>
    <updated>2005-03-25T02:23:27Z</updated>
    <published>2005-03-25T02:23:27Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Web development" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Juice]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/juice/"><![CDATA[
<p>I've been checking my access logs for google searches, and I seem to be enjoying amazing <a href="http://catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/G/google-juice.html">Google juice</a> at the moment.  </p>

<p>I'm getting about 200 hits a week from Google, but when I've looked up the searches that people have done, I'm astonished to find myself rating very highly on a variety of simple searches.  For example, I'm currently number one for <b>Mandrake firewall</b>, <b>php flatfile</b> (and first/very high on related searches), <b>knotify command</b> (and very high for anything related to knotify).  The other <a href="articles.php">KDE articles</a> I've done also get very good coverage for searches on relevant keywords.</p>

<p>I'm in the top 10 for <b>"website code"</b>, <b>jasper fforde</b>, <b>lockridge my king</b> (and lots similar, which go to the <a href="articles.php?id=7">My King</a> page I put up), <b>jonathan edward's resolutions</b> (and similar), <b>VBA modules</b> and lots more.</p>

<p>Some of these make sense, as there genuinely isn't much else on these topics.  But for things like <b>Mandrake firewall</b> and others, I have almost no information, and there is no way I have any PageRank for those searches.  I can only come up with these things:</p>
<ul>
  <li>All my pages have relevant keywords in the title of the page.  In fact, I constructed my blog software with that requirement in mind.</li>
  <li>Most pages have very little on them apart from the content, and the content is always first in the source.</li>
  <li>Because I have static pages, quite often I have files named things like 'websitecode.html', and I believe Googlebots lap this up.</li>
</ul>
<p>The first two are just standard ways to make sure your content is indexed well and rated highly, so I wouldn't have thought that would give me such an advantage.  Perhaps its just that lots of people don't do the simple things, and use software that adds a load of extra stuff.  Or that Google isn't all that good at finding relevant things anymore.</p>

]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/spam/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/spam/</id>
    <updated>2005-02-01T23:46:27Z</updated>
    <published>2005-02-01T23:46:27Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Personal and misc" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="lukeplant.me.uk" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Spam]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/spam/"><![CDATA[
<p>I'm getting spam from all quarters.  My Cutenews news page is getting comment spam.  My Obfuscated English page is getting tons of comment spam (all moderated out thankfully).  My e-mail spam is not too bad at the moment, as I've been very careful with it, but it's getting worse.  My website referrer logs are being <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spamming#Referer_spam'>spammed</a>! Stupid, as it currently does them no good at all - nothing is automatically gleaned from the referrer logs</p>

<p>I guess this is the fundamental problem with spam - it's so cheap that it doesn't matter how incredibly ineffecient it is.  This means the spammers will continue to the point that every useful but unprotected feature of the internet is ruined beyond repair, at great loss to internet users in general and very little gain for the spammers.  Sigh....</p>

<p>What is even more worrying is mindless vandalism, such <a href='http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Dealing_with_vandalism'>Wikipedia Vandalism</a>, which does the perp's no good at all.  I wouldn't be surprised if this kind of things actually causes the demise of many useful parts of the internet.</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Money]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/money/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/money/</id>
    <updated>2005-01-29T23:25:33Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-29T23:25:33Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Personal and misc" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Money]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/money/"><![CDATA[
<p>That money talks<br>
I'll not deny<br>
I heard it once<br>
It said 'goodbye'<br>
</p>

<p>That was the story of today.  <a href='http://www.jonobacon.org/viewcomments.php?id=433'>Like someone else a lot more famous than me</a>, I had to get my tax return done today (I love reading blogs from well known Brits, it makes the internet feel more like home when you find people who have things in common with you not just in intellectual interest but in day-to-day chores).  Tax returns and payments are due on 31st of January for last tax year (ending Apr 04) over here, and I was glad to find I wasn't the only one doing it last minute.  As I actually earnt something in my second year of self employment, and I hadn't paid any tax for it til today, I had a hefty chunk taken out of my bank balance.</p>

<p>I also used the occasion to get my giving to church sorted out (I had been woefully negligent in this area, partly because being self-employed makes it difficult to work out how much you are actually earning, especially for someone as allergic to finances as me, but mainly 'cause I'm just a shockingly negligent kind of person).  That took another hefty whack out.  But the lightened mind and conscience more than compensated for the lightened bank balance, and, out of God's abundant provision for me, my balance is still very healthy!  So the initial poem isn't true yet (but it was too good an opportunity to miss).</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <author>
      <name></name>
      <uri>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog</uri>
    </author>
    <title type="html"><![CDATA[Linux friendly radio]]></title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/linux-friendly-radio/" />
    <id>http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/linux-friendly-radio/</id>
    <updated>2005-01-22T23:58:34Z</updated>
    <published>2005-01-22T23:58:34Z</published>
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Internet" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Music" />
    <category scheme="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog" term="Linux" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Linux friendly radio]]></summary>
    <content type="html" xml:base="http://lukeplant.me.uk/blog/posts/linux-friendly-radio/"><![CDATA[
<p>I would like to congratulate <a href='http://www.virginradio.co.uk/'>Virgin Radio</a> on their very Linux friendly web site.  Their <a href='http://www.virginradio.co.uk/thestation/listen/index.html'>listen online</a> page autodetects a Linux browser and gives options for streaming audio that are more Linux friendly (Ogg Vorbis listed first, and then MP3).  They even apologise at the bottom of the page for one of their streams which is only available as a WMA stream (which is usually Windows only).</p>
<p><img src="/blogmedia/virginradio_1.jpeg" alt="Virgin Radio screen shot" title="Virgin Radio being Linux friendly"></p>
<p>They better not keep this up, or I'll get positively spoilt!</p>

<p>On top of this, they actually seem to have a policy of playing quite good songs a lot of the time.  For a fairly mainstream popular music station, this is a bold and unorthodox move, but one I'm surprised that other stations haven't thought of.  This evening I've been treated to some absolute classics including "Every breath you take" by The Police and, one of my all time favorites, "I'll stand by you" by The Pretenders.  It can't last long...</p>

<p>(I have to add -- this is not a blanket endorsement of Virgin Radio!  I believe that the music we listen to can have a massive influence on us, and pop music especially so, as it very often brings a non-Christian culture and morality with it, either implicitly or explicitly.  That topic deserves some proper attention in another post, I just wanted to quickly say here that I believe Christians need to be very careful about anything they listen to, and I don't want to cause anyone to stumble.  Most of what I've been listening to on Virgin Radio tonight has been passing my tests, but if you think my judgement is off please do leave a comment!).</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
